-
Key Takeaways
-
What Does Supported Mean in a VM backup Compatibility Matrix?
-
Which Platforms and Versions Does Vinchin List for VM Backup?
-
Does Its Own Vendor Still Support a Version on the Backup List?
-
Why Does the Same Platform Version Give Different Backup Results?
-
How Do You Verify Compatibility Before Deploying?
-
Which Action Fits Which Situation?
-
How Do These Rules Apply in Typical Estates?
-
Troubleshooting: Compatibility Symptoms and Causes
-
FAQs
-
Conclusion
A VM backup compatibility matrix shows which hypervisor and platform versions a backup product can connect to, and which backup and restore functions work on each. As listed in the Vinchin Help Center on September 20, 2026, Vinchin Backup & Recovery protects VMware vSphere 5.0 to 8.0 U3, Microsoft Hyper-V on Windows Server 2012 R2 to 2022, Proxmox VE 7.2 to 9.1, XCP-ng 7.4 to 8.3, Citrix Hypervisor 8.0 to 8.4, oVirt 4.0 to 4.5, Red Hat Virtualization (RHV) 4.0 to 4.5 and Oracle Linux Virtualization Manager (OLVM) 4.3 to 4.5, plus other platforms. A version appearing on that list answers only one of three questions: whether the tool can connect, whether the platform vendor still supports that version, and whether incremental backup will work on your VMs.
Key Takeaways
Read every matrix in two passes. The version pass tells you whether a tool can connect; the capability pass tells you whether incremental backup, instant restore, and cross-platform restore work on that version and configuration.
Five of the eight core platform lines include versions their own vendors no longer support: vSphere 7.0, Proxmox VE 7 and 8, XCP-ng 8.2, RHV 4.x and Windows Server 2012 R2.
Incremental backup is decided per VM, not per platform. VMware needs VM hardware version 7 or later with change tracking enabled, Hyper-V’s RCT-based backup needs a Windows Server 2016 or later host, and libvirt/QEMU incrementals need qcow2 disks.
Restore options differ by platform. The Vinchin Help Center documents Instant Restore for VMware, Proxmox VE, XCP-ng, Citrix, oVirt, RHV, and OLVM, but lists only Full, Granular, and Cross-Platform Restore for Hyper-V.
Newest releases may not be listed yet. vSphere 9.x and Hyper-V on Windows Server 2025 do not appear in the Help Center’s VM backup list as of September 20, 2026. Confirm before upgrading hosts.
Re-verify at each upstream deadline. The next one in this data set is January 12, 2027, when Windows Server 2016 extended support ends.
What Does Supported Mean in a VM backup Compatibility Matrix?
"Supported" can mean three different things. A matrix that does not say which one it means is incomplete.
This table (Table 1) lists three layers.
Layer | Question it answers | Where the answer lives | Typical failure |
Connection | Can the backup software authenticate to the hypervisor or its manager and read VM disks? | Backup vendor’s supported-environments list | Host or manager version is not on the list |
Capability | Do incremental backup, granular restore, instant restore, and cross-platform restore work on this version and configuration? | Backup vendor’s per-platform documentation plus the platform’s own change tracking documentation | Every “incremental” job transfers a full disk |
Lifecycle | Does the platform vendor still ship security for this version? | Platform vendor’s lifecycle page | The backup is healthy, but the hypervisor underneath no longer receives patches |
Three stacked layers (Connection, Capability, Lifecycle) with a VM at the top and one example failure per layer, so the reader sees that a green tick on one layer says nothing about the other two.
This article scopes to agentless, image-level VM backup taken at the hypervisor level. Databases, mail servers, and file systems inside the VM have their own version lists, covered in the FAQ.
Which Platforms and Versions Does Vinchin List for VM Backup?
The tables below reproduce the Supported Environments section of the Vinchin Help Center as of September 20, 2026. Vinchin Backup & Recovery takes VM backups from the hypervisor level without installing agents inside guests. Where the Help Center writes a family such as "5.x" or "4.X.X", that wording is kept.
This table (Table 2) shows the core virtualization platforms and listed versions.
Platform | Versions listed | Notes |
VMware vSphere | 5.0.0, 5.1.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 6.7, 7.0 (U1, U2, U3), 8.0 (U1, U2, U3) | Standalone ESXi hosts or vCenter-managed hosts. vSphere 9.x is not listed. |
Microsoft Hyper-V | On Windows Server: 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022. Microsoft Hyper-V Server: 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, plus Windows 8.1, 10 and 11 (Desktop) | Windows Server 2025 is not listed for Hyper-V hosts. Windows Server 2025 does appear in the separate physical-server backup list. |
Proxmox VE | 7.2, 7.4, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1 | 7.0, 7.1, and 7.3 are not individually listed. |
XCP-ng | 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.2.1, 8.3 | 8.2 and 8.2.1 are the same LTS release under two version numbers. |
Citrix Hypervisor/XenServer | Citrix Hypervisor 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4; Citrix XenServer 6.x, 7.x, 8 | The Help Center lists the two product names separately. Check which name and version your pool reports. |
oVirt | 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 | The Help Center has a backup-plugin installation page for oVirt; check its requirements for your version. |
Red Hat Virtualization (RHV) | 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 | From RHV 4.4.7 onward, no backup plugin is required. Below that, the plugin must match the exact platform version and be installed on every host, not on the engine. |
Oracle Linux Virtualization Manager (OLVM) | 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 | OLVM 4.5 is based on oVirt 4.5.5 and supports Oracle Linux 8 KVM hosts. |
The following table (Table 3) shows other virtualization, private cloud, and container platforms.
Platform | Version listed |
H3C CAS | E0506, E0526, E0530, E0535, E0706, E0709, E0710, E0718, E0730, v7.0 |
H3C UIS | E0606, E0611, E0716, E0720, E0721, E0750, E0881, E0802P01 |
H3C CAS/UIS CVD | E082P01, E0886, E0786P02, R0785P03 |
Huawei FusionCompute (KVM) | 6.5.1, 8.0, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9 |
Inspur ICS | 6.0.1+; ICS 8.x plugin compatibility documented |
SmartX HCI | Supported; exact version range to be confirmed |
WinHong CNware | 5.4.0, 5.5.1, 6.0.0, 6.5.0, 7.0.0, 7.1.0, 7.5.0 |
WinHong CNware WinStack | Supported; exact version range to be confirmed |
Sangfor HCI | 5.x, 6.0.1, 6.0.1R1, 6.2.0, 6.3.0, 6.7.0, 6.7.0R2, 6.8.0, 6.8.0R1, 6.8.1, 6.9 |
Sangfor Cloud Platform (SCP) | 6.10.0, 6.10.0.R1, 6.11.1 |
ZStack ZSphere | 4.X.X |
ZStack Cloud | 3.5, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 4.0.1, 4.3.0, 4.3.28, 4.4.16, 4.5.1, 4.6.11, 4.7.11, 4.8.0, 5.X.X |
OpenStack | Mitaka to Zed version (Need Ceph/NetApp/Promise as production storage)
|
zVirt | 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 4.0, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4 |
Other listed platforms | Acfra (os6.1.1, aoc4.4.0), HOSTVM 4.4, RED Virtualization 7.3.0, ROSA Virtualization 2.1 |
Public cloud | AWS EC2; Huawei Cloud ECS |
Kubernetes | 1.28.15, 1.30.6, 1.33.1 |
Which Restore Methods are Documented for Each Platform?
Full and Granular Restore are documented for every platform in the following table. Instant Restore is documented for every listed virtualization platform except Hyper-V.
This table (Table 4) shows restore options documented in the Vinchin Help Center, by platform.
Platform | Full | Granular | Instant | Cross-Platform |
VMware vSphere | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Microsoft Hyper-V | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Proxmox VE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
XCP-ng | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Citrix Hypervisor/XenServer | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
oVirt, RHV, OLVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
H3C CAS/UIS (incl. CVD), Huawei FusionCompute, Sangfor HCI/SCP, ZStack ZSphere | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Inspur UCS | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
SmartX | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
WinHong CNware/WinStack | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
ZStack Cloud | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
OpenStack, AWS EC2, Huawei Cloud ECS | Yes | Yes | OpenStack and Huawei Cloud ECS Yes; AWS EC2 No | Yes |
Does Its Own Vendor Still Support a Version on the Backup List?
Not necessarily. A backup vendor's list defines what the tool can read. It does not track whether the platform vendor still patches that version.
This table (Table 5) lists Vinchin-listed versions against upstream vendor lifecycle status.
Platform | Listed versions past vendor support | Upstream lifecycle fact |
VMware vSphere | 7.0 and earlier | General support for vSphere 7.0 ended October 2, 2025. Broadcom's lifecycle matrix lists 8.0 general support through October 11, 2027; confirm on Broadcom's Product Lifecycle page before relying on it. |
Microsoft Hyper-V | Windows Server 2012 R2 | Microsoft states that Windows Server 2012 R2 has reached end of support. Extended support for Windows Server 2016 ends January 12, 2027. |
Proxmox VE | 7.x and 8.x | Proxmox lists end of life as 2024-07 for version 7 and 2026-08 for version 8; version 9 is "tba". |
XCP-ng | 8.2 (8.2.1) | XCP-ng 8.2 LTS was supported until 2025-09-16. XCP-ng 8.3 LTS is supported until 2028-11-30. |
Red Hat Virtualization | 4.x (all listed) | Red Hat's Maintenance Phase ran until August 31, 2024, followed by an Extended Life Phase with no more software fixes through August 31, 2026. |
Why Does the Same Platform Version Give Different Backup Results?
Because incremental backup depends on change tracking, and each platform's change tracking has its own prerequisites that vary by VM and disk, not just by version.
This table (Table 6) outlines the Change-tracking prerequisites that determine whether incremental backup works.
Platform family | Mechanism | Documented prerequisite | If it is not met |
VMware vSphere | Changed Block Tracking (CBT) in the VMkernel | VM hardware version 7 or later; I/O through the ESXi storage stack; CBT is disabled on a VM by default. | An incremental backup might back up the complete disk or revert to a full backup. |
Microsoft Hyper-V | Resilient Change Tracking (RCT) through the Hyper-V WMI API | The WMI-and-RCT approach is not available on earlier hosts. | |
oVirt, RHV, OLVM (libvirt/QEMU) | QEMU dirty bitmaps tracked as libvirt checkpoints | qcow2 disks at the active layer. Persistent bitmaps exist only on qcow2 images. | If a bitmap is missing or unknown, oVirt's design requires deleting the checkpoints and taking a full backup. |
Proxmox VE, XCP-ng, Citrix, others | Platform-specific | Not covered here. Confirm against the platform's documentation and the backup vendor's Help Center. | |
How Do You Verify Compatibility Before Deploying?
Compare exact versions, check capability prerequisites, then prove one incremental cycle and one restore on a pilot VM.
1. Record exact versions. Capture the host build and the manager version (vCenter, oVirt/RHV engine). Use the commands in the following table. Easy to get wrong: "vSphere 8.x" is not a version; the list names 8.0 U1, U2, and U3.
2. Compare against the vendor's list at the update level. Match hotfix suffixes such as Sangfor's "R1" and build-specific entries such as H3C's E-numbers.
3. Check lifecycle status on the platform vendor's page (Table 5 sources).
4. Check capability prerequisites from Table 6: VM hardware version, Hyper-V host OS, qcow2 disk format, and any platform-side plugin. Easy to get wrong: on RHV, the plugin must match the exact platform version and, below 4.4.7, goes on every host but not on the engine.
5. Run the pilot. Back up a representative VM twice and confirm the second run is incremental.
6. Test each restore mode you depend on. Use Table 4 to choose which to test, including a restore to the intended target platform. Easy to get wrong: testing only Full Restore and assuming Instant or Cross-Platform Restore behave the same.
7. Date-stamp the result and re-run before any host upgrade.
The following table (Table 7) is about commands for capturing version and configuration data.
Platform | What to capture | Command or location |
VMware ESXi | Host version and build | esxcli system version get in the ESXi Shell |
Hyper-V | Host OS and VM configuration version | Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object OsName, OsVersion and Get-VM | Select-Object Name, Version |
Proxmox VE | Node version | pveversion |
XCP-ng | Release version | grep PRODUCT_VERSION /etc/xensource-inventory |
oVirt/RHV/OLVM | Component versions and disk format | rpm -q vdsm libvirt qemu-kvm on a host; qemu-img info <disk-image> for format |
These commands are standard on their platforms. Output details vary by version and configuration.
Which Action Fits Which Situation?
Decide by two facts: whether your exact version is on the backup vendor's list, and whether the platform vendor still supports it.
This table (Table 8) is a decision matrix.
Listed by backup vendor? | Supported by platform vendor? | Recommended action |
Yes | Yes | Deploy. Still run the capability checks in Table 6 and the pilot from the workflow. |
Yes | No (for example vSphere 7.0, Proxmox VE 8 after August 2026, XCP-ng 8.2, RHV, Windows Server 2012 R2) | Back up now to preserve recovery points, and schedule an upgrade or migration. Confirm the target version is also listed. |
No (for example vSphere 9.x or Hyper-V on Windows Server 2025 as of September 20, 2026) | Yes | Hold production host upgrades until the backup vendor confirms support. A lab test shows connectivity, not vendor-validated support. |
Yes | Yes, but a prerequisite is missing (for example raw disks on KVM, hardware version below 7 on vSphere) | Fix the configuration, or plan window and capacity around full-disk reads. |
Common Mistakes
Treating a major-line entry as covering every update level within it.
Checking the host version but not the manager version, or the reverse.
Assuming Instant Restore exists on every listed platform.
Forgetting that guest-level lists (databases, Exchange) are separate from the VM platform list.
Sizing storage from the first successful incremental in a pilot without checking the disk or hardware-version conditions in Table 6.
How Do These Rules Apply in Typical Estates?
These are illustrative scenarios built from the tables above, not customer case studies.
The following table (Table 9) is scenario-based recommendations.
Scenario | What the tables say | Recommendation |
vSphere 7.0 U3 estate migrating to Proxmox VE 9.1 | Both versions are listed. vSphere 7.0 general support ended October 2, 2025. | Keep backing up the source until cutover. Pilot cross-platform restore on non-critical VMs and verify boot and drivers on the target. |
Hyper-V hosts on Windows Server 2016, considering an in-place move to Windows Server 2025 | 2016 is listed and RCT-capable; 2025 is not listed for Hyper-V. Extended support for 2016 ends January 12, 2027. | Ask Vinchin to confirm Windows Server 2025 Hyper-V support before upgrading. If it is not yet confirmed, plan the upgrade around a listed version such as 2022. |
RHV 4.3 environment | Listed. RHV's Extended Life Phase ended August 31, 2026. Below 4.4.7, a version-matched plugin is required on every host. | Confirm plugin versions on all hosts, and set a dated exit plan. |
Mixed vSphere 8.0 U3 and Proxmox VE 9.1 | Both are listed, and both are currently supported by their vendors (Proxmox VE 9 end of life is "tba"). | Verify the two platforms' capability prerequisites separately, since their change-tracking layers differ. |
Troubleshooting: Compatibility Symptoms and Causes
Symptom | Likely compatibility cause | What to check |
vSphere incremental jobs transfer whole disks | CBT is disabled or not functioning | VM hardware version 7 or later and CBT state. |
Hyper-V VMs never use change tracking | Host is older than Windows Server 2016 | Host OS version. |
KVM-based incrementals restart as full backups | Missing or unknown bitmap, or disks not in qcow2 format | Disk format with qemu-img info and the platform's checkpoint state. |
RHV backup jobs fail after a plugin change | Plugin was uninstalled without reinstalling or upgrading | Plugin present on every host at the matching version. Vinchin's documentation warns that jobs fail if the plugin is removed without a replacement. |
Platform cannot be added or jobs are rejected | Exact version is not on the list | Compare build and update level against Tables 2 and 3. |
FAQs
Q1: Should I check the compatibility list before upgrading my hypervisor, and should I take a backup first?
Yes to both. Proxmox VE documents that minor upgrades are ordinary package updates, while major upgrades such as 8.4 to 9.0 must be carefully planned and tested and should never be started without a current backup ready. Take a fresh backup, run a test restore, confirm the target version is listed by your backup vendor, and only then upgrade.
Q2: Are Windows client editions of Hyper-V covered?
The Help Center lists Windows 8.1, Windows 10 and Windows 11 (Desktop) under the Microsoft Hyper-V Server entry, alongside Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 to 2022. Hyper-V on Windows Server is listed separately for 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, and 2022.
Q3: Does Vinchin support standalone ESXi hosts or only vCenter?
Vinchin's VMware backup page states that it protects vSphere environments on standalone ESXi hosts or vCenter-managed hosts.
Q4: Does the VM platform list cover databases and applications running inside the VMs?
No. Database and application support is listed separately, for example Oracle Database 10g to 21c, Microsoft SQL Server 2008 to 2022, MySQL 5.5 to 8.0, PostgreSQL 12 to 16, and Exchange Server 2013 to 2019. Check both lists when application-level recovery matters.
Q5: Are Kubernetes clusters and cloud instances covered by the same list?
They are listed in separate sections. Kubernetes 1.28.15, 1.30.6 and 1.33.1 are listed, along with AWS EC2 and Huawei Cloud ECS instances.
Conclusion
Treat every compatibility list as a dated snapshot. Before adding a platform, upgrading a host, or planning a migration, compare the exact version, test one incremental cycle and one restore, and note the date. The matrix that matters is the one you verified on your own VMs, not the one printed on any vendor page, including this one.
Share on: